Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The function of Ag-specific central (T(CM)) and effector (T(EM)) memory CD4+ T lymphocytes remains poorly characterized in vivo in humans. Using CD154 as a marker of Ag-specific CD4+T cells, we studied the differentiation of memory subsets following anti-hepatitis B immunization. Hepatitis B surface Ag (HBs)-specific memory CD4+T cells were heterogeneous and included T(CM) (CCR7+CD27+) and T(EM) (CCR7(-)CD27(+/-)). HBs-specific T(CM) and T(EM) shared the capacity to produce multiple cytokines, including IL-2 and IFN-gamma. Several years postimmunization, approximately 10% of HBs-specific memory CD4+ T cells were in cycle (Ki67+) and the proliferating cells were CCR7+. These results suggest that the model of functional specialization of T(CM) and T(EM) cannot be applied to protein vaccine Ags and support the concept that T(CM) are capable of self-renewal and contribute to maintain the pool of memory cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stubbe et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: