Why the study?
Does inhibition of the SOX18-mevalonate pathway axis with R(+) propranolol or statins reduce infantile hemangioma vessel formation in preclinical models?
Does inhibition of the SOX18-mevalonate pathway axis with R(+) propranolol or statins reduce infantile hemangioma vessel formation in preclinical models?
The study identifies the endothelial SOX18-mevalonate pathway axis as a central regulator of infantile hemangioma pathogenesis, providing a mechanistic rationale for repurposing statins to treat the condition.
Preclinical findings do not support statin or R(+) propranolol use in infantile hemangioma; leaves open clinical translation of SOX18-mevalonate inhibition.
Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common tumor in children and a paradigm for pathological vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and regression. Propranolol, the mainstay of treatment, inhibits IH vessel formation via a β-adrenergic receptor-independent off-target effect of its R(+) enantiomer on endothelial SOX18 - a member of the SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) family of transcription factors. Transcriptomic profiling of patient-derived hemangioma stem cells uncovered the mevalonate pathway (MVP) as a target of R(+) propranolol. Loss and gain of function of SOX18 confirmed it is both necessary and sufficient for R(+) propranolol suppression of the MVP, including regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and the rate-limiting enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR). A biological relevance of the endothelial SOX18-MVP axis in IH patient tissue was demonstrated by nuclear colocalization of SOX18 and SREBP2. Functional validation in a preclinical IH xenograft model revealed that statins - competitive inhibitors of HMGCR - efficiently suppress IH vessel formation. We propose an endothelial SOX18-MVP axis as a central regulator of IH pathogenesis and suggest statin repurposing to treat IH. The pleiotropic effects of R(+) propranolol and statins along the SOX18-MVP axis to disable an endothelial cell-specific program may have therapeutic implications for other vascular disease entities involving pathological vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holm et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: