This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
As a means of improving intellectual work performance through office environment designs, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of external refreshing stimuli during tasks, termed Micro-refresh, using airflows. Each participant performed the 45-min comparison task under both conditions, with and without airflow stimuli. In the airflow condition, 30-s airflow stimuli directed around participants’ hands were exposed every 5 min. Differences were compared among the conditions with the Concentration Time Ratio (CTR) and several subjective evaluations. Valid data from 24 participants were obtained, and as a result, the average CTR was 2.3% points higher with airflow stimuli (p < 0.05). Further analysis suggested that providing refreshing stimuli by airflow has the potential to suppress the decline in concentration, especially later in the task. These findings could contribute to proposing a promising method to improve performance, refreshing stimuli during tasks, which are different from enforcing work breaks or managing overall indoor thermal environments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: