Key result
The addition of a Clinical Decision Support System to usual care significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing in geriatric patients, reducing the Medication Appropriateness Index score at discharge to 7.26 compared to 9.95 with usual care alone (p=0.046).
Why the study?
Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing, motivating evaluation of a clinical decision support system using START-STOPP criteria in a geriatric ward.
Does a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) improve the appropriateness of prescribing in geriatric patients with polypharmacy admitted to a hospital?
Cohort (n=125)
Single-blind
Yes
Does a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) improve the appropriateness of prescribing in geriatric patients with polypharmacy admitted to a hospital?
The use of a Clinical Decision Support System based on START-STOPP criteria significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing in hospitalized geriatric patients compared to usual care alone.
Hypothesis-generating for CDSS on geriatric wards; prospective RCTs needed before it should change practice.
Purpose: Polypharmacy is a known risk factor for potentially inappropriate prescribing. Recently there is an increasing interest in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to improve prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a CDSS, with the START-STOPP criteria as main content in the setting of a geriatric ward. Endpoints were 1) appropriateness of prescribing and 2) acceptance rate of recommendations. Methods: This prospective study comparing the use of a CDSS with usual care involved patients admitted to geriatric wards in two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included from January to May 2017. The medications of 64 patients in the first six weeks was assessed according to the current standard, whereas the medications of 61 patients in the second six weeks were also assessed by using a CDSS. Medication appropriateness was assessed with the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Results: The medications of 125 patients (median age 83 years) were reviewed. In both the usual care group and the intervention group MAI scores decreased significantly from admission to discharge (within group analyses, p<0.001). This effect was significantly larger in the intervention group (p<0.05). MAI scores at discharge in the usual care group and the intervention group were respectively 9.95±6.70 and 7.26±5.07. The CDSS generated 193 recommendations, of which 71 concerned START criteria, 45 STOPP criteria, and 77 potential interactions. Overall, 31.6% of the recommendations were accepted. Conclusion: This study shows that a CDSS to improve prescribing has additional value in the setting of a geriatric ward. Almost one third of the software-generated recommendations were interpreted as clinically relevant and accepted, on average one per patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanenberg et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Polypharmacy (n=125). Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) vs. Usual care (comprehensive geriatric assessment and medication review) was evaluated on Appropriateness of prescribing assessed by the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score at discharge (η²=0.032, p=0.046). The addition of a Clinical Decision Support System to usual care significantly improved the appropriateness of prescribing in geriatric patients, reducing the Medication Appropriateness Index score at discharge to 7.26 compared to 9.95 with usual care alone (p=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: