Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) and 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene (HATP) with [Cu(Me 3 tacn)] 2+ (Me 3 tacn = 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane) produces trigonal tricopper complexes [(Me 3 tacnCu) 3 (HOTP)] 3+ ( 1 ) and [(Me 3 tacnCu) 3 (HITP)] 4+ ( 2 ) (HOTP, HITP = hexaoxy- and hexaiminotriphenylene, respectively). These trinuclear complexes are molecular models for spin exchange interactions in the two-dimensional conductive metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) copper hexaoxytriphenylene (Cu 3 HOTP 2 ) and copper hexaiminotriphenylene (Cu 3 HITP 2 ). Whereas complex 1 is isolated with HOTP 3– bearing the same oxidation state as found in the oxy-bridged MOF, the triply oxidized HITP 3– found in Cu 3 HITP 2 is unstable with respect to disproportionation in the molecular model. Indeed, magnetic measurements reveal ligand-centered radical character for 1 and a closed-shell structure for 2, in agreement with the redox state of the ligands. All neighboring spins are antiferromagnetically coupled in 1 and 2 . These results help probe metal–ligand–metal interactions in conductive MOFs and provide potential inspiration for the synthesis of other two-dimensional materials with delocalized electrons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: