This article uses a 4-pronged statistical approach to examine the impact of a mental health carve-out at a major employer. To examine net financial impact of the carve-out, the authors perform a pre-post, multivariate regression analysis of changes in costs. Using a random-effects model, the authors explore the ultimate financial impact of the carve-out for patients and for the firm. Using a multinomial logistic regression, they examine differing program effects by intensity of use. A fixed-effects negative binomial regression models the episodic nature of outpatient care, controlling for patient-specific unobserved characteristics that influence health care utilization. The carve-out slightly reduced overall mental health costs and utilization while expanding entry-level access to routine services. At the same time, the specific carve-out shifted financial burdens from the firm onto high-utilization patients. Therefore, this carve-out appears poorly suited to the care of individuals experiencing severe and debilitating psychiatric disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grazier et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: