Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract 1 H, 13 C and 15 N NMR chemical shifts for 28 substituted 2‐phenacylpyridines (ketimine forms) and their enolimine tautomers, ( Z )‐2‐(2‐hydroxy‐2‐phenylvinyl)pyridines, were calculated via the GIAO/DFT approach. Among four tested methods at the B3LYP level of theory, the 6–311G, 6–311++G and 6–311G ** basis sets gave acceptable result for 13 C NMR chemical shifts whereas the 6–311++G ** basis set was the minimum needed for reproduction of 15 N NMR chemical shifts. Satisfactory reproduction of 13 C and 15 N NMR chemical shifts for different tautomers revealed that intramolecular hydrogen bonding could be modeled reliably by these calculations when the geometry optimizations were done with the HF/3–21G method. Agreements between theoretical and experimental 13 C and 15 N NMR chemical shifts and also HF/3–21G and HF/6–31G ** optimized structural parameters with those obtained by x‐ray crystallographic measurements suggests that it is not necessary to select too sophisticated and CPU time‐intensive methods for geometry optimizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ośmiałowski et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: