Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Semen was collected from bulls by means of the electro-ejaculation method developed by Thibault et al. (1948). 2. A copious sperm-free fraction of the ejaculate, produced in the early phase of stimulation, was examined for its chemical composition. 3. This secretion was found to have a low protein content, but its chloride concentration was higher than in the sperm-containing fractions of the ejaculate. Fructose and citric acid occurred in very low concentrations, and 5-nucleotidase was absent in the pre-sperm secretion. This indicates clearly that the secretion does not originate either in the seminal vesicles or in the ampullar glands; it is probable that it represents a discharge from the urethral glands. 4. The effect of the pre-sperm ejaculate fraction upon bull sperm fructolysis and motility was examined; both were unaffected by a considerable excess of this secretion. 5. The chemical composition of the pre-sperm secretion makes it unlikely that under physiological conditions it could play a role in the nutrition of the spermatozoa; presumably, its chief function is the clearing of the urethral passage prior to the descent of the semen proper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lutwak‐Mann et al. (1953) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: