Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
α-Fe 2 O 3 /ZnFe 2 O 4 composite electrodes are prepared via a simple surface treatment performed on nanoparticulate α-Fe 2 O 3 electrodes. The α-Fe 2 O 3 electrodes are uniformly covered with a solution containing Zn 2+ ions which react with Fe 2 O 3 upon heating to form ZnFe 2 O 4 . As Zn 2+ ions do not completely diffuse into the core of Fe 2 O 3 particles under mild heating conditions, the ZnFe 2 O 4 forms only on the surface of Fe 2 O 3 as a shell layer, resulting in the formation of Fe 2 O 3 /ZnFe 2 O 4 composite electrodes. Any unreacted ZnO is removed by dissolution in 1 M NaOH, where ZnFe 2 O 4 and Fe 2 O 3 are stable. X-ray diffraction and energy-dispersive spectroscopy studies show that a crystalline ZnFe 2 O 4 phase forms after the heat treatment and the composite electrode with the best photoelectrochemical performances contains a 1:1 mol ratio of ZnFe 2 O 4 and Fe 2 O 3 . The Fe 2 O 3 /ZnFe 2 O 4 composite electrode shows a significantly enhanced photocurrent response compared to the bare Fe 2 O 3 electrode because ZnFe 2 O 4 has conduction and valence band edges shifted ca. 200 mV from those of Fe 2 O 3 to the negative direction which allows for the efficient separation of electron–hole pairs at the Fe 2 O 3 /ZnFe 2 O 4 interface. Further improvement in photocurrent is observed when the surface is modified by an Al 3+ treatment that forms thin ZnFe 2– x Al x O 4 or Fe 2– x Al x O 3 layers that reduce surface states created by Fe 3+ ions exposed on the surface having imperfect coordination environments. The formation of ZnFe 2 O 4 and Al 3+ -containing layers make the surface less catalytic for O 2 evolution, and therefore, introduction of the Co 2+ ions as oxygen evolution catalysts further improved the over performance of the composite electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDonald et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: