Key result
Oral administration of trazodone in healthy dogs significantly decreased platelet aggregation compared to baseline (62% vs 95%, P=0.002), whereas placebo did not.
Why the study?
Trazodone is commonly used for canine anxiety, and SSRI therapy in humans is associated with bleeding disorders and arrhythmogenesis, motivating evaluation of its effects on primary hemostasis and cQT interval in dogs.
Does trazodone alter markers of primary hemostasis and corrected QT interval in healthy dogs?
RCT (n=15)
Single-blinded
randomized
Does trazodone alter markers of primary hemostasis and corrected QT interval in healthy dogs?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trazodone administration in healthy dogs decreases platelet aggregation but does not significantly prolong the cQT interval or alter other primary hemostasis markers.
BACKGROUND: Trazodone is a serotonin antagonist/reuptake inhibitor medication commonly used for anxiety in dogs. Therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in humans is associated with bleeding disorders and increased arrhythmogenesis. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate markers of primary hemostasis and corrected QT (cQT) interval in dogs before and after oral administration of standard dosages of trazodone or placebo. ANIMALS: Fifteen apparently healthy, client-owned dogs. METHODS: A single-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled crossover study was performed. Dogs were administered trazodone (5 to 7.5 mg/kg PO Q12h) or placebo. [Correction added after first online publication on 14 October 2023. In the abstract (methods) section (57.5 mg/kg PO Q12h) changed as (5 to 7.5 mg/kg PO Q12h).] Buccal mucosal bleeding time (BMBT), platelet count, platelet aggregation via Plateletworks, PFA-100 closure time and cQT interval were measured. A Shapiro-Wilk test was performed followed by either a paired t test or a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in the BMBT, PFA-100 closure times, platelet counts, and cQT interval between trazodone or placebo. However, using Plateletworks, there was a significant decrease in platelet aggregation after administration of trazodone (95%; 81-97 vs 62%; 39-89, P = .002) and not placebo (95%; 81-97 vs 91%; 81-96, P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: It is unknown if this represents a clinically relevant change or if dogs with preexisting impairment in primary hemostasis or receiving higher dosages or longer durations of trazodone could have a more substantial change in hemostatic variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in healthy dogs (n=15). trazodone vs. placebo was evaluated on platelet aggregation via Plateletworks (p=.002). Oral administration of trazodone in healthy dogs significantly decreased platelet aggregation compared to baseline (62% vs 95%, P=0.002), whereas placebo did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: