Why the study?
Does laboratory-defined aspirin resistance predict worse clinical profiles and higher cardiac necrosis markers in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Does laboratory-defined aspirin resistance predict worse clinical profiles and higher cardiac necrosis markers in patients with NSTE-ACS?
Laboratory-defined aspirin resistance identifies a higher-risk subset of NSTE-ACS patients who present with greater myocardial necrosis and higher TIMI risk scores.
May flag higher-risk NSTE-ACS patients for closer monitoring; leaves open whether resistance testing should guide therapy.
In this study, we aimed to assess the factors associated with laboratory-defined aspirin resistance and the relationship of this laboratory-defined aspirin resistance with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score, markers of cardiac necrosis, and inflammatory and thrombotic risk factors in patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Ninety-seven patients who were under aspirin therapy and hospitalized with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction were included in the study. Laboratory-defined aspirin sensitive and resistant groups were determined by platelet function analyzer; aspirin resistance was defined as collagen/epinephrine closure time less than 165 s. Laboratory-defined aspirin resistance was noted in 29 patients (29.9%), and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was observed in 46 patients (47.4%). Patients in the group with laboratory-defined aspirin resistance had significantly higher thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk scores (P < 0.001). When the details of cardiac myonecrosis markers were compared, baseline and follow-up creatine kinase-myocardial band and troponin I values were higher in laboratory-defined aspirin-resistant group. Multivariate analyses revealed that laboratory-defined aspirin resistance was an independent predictor of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.022). Laboratory-defined aspirin resistance is associated with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, higher markers of cardiac necrosis and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in patients hospitalized with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Açıkel et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: