This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Providing plants with adequate nitrogen (N) through an appropriate ammonium-to-nitrate-ratio (NH 4 + /NO 3 − -ratio) can enhance nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and promote growth. However, how different NH 4 + /NO 3 − -ratios affect N and carbon (C) metabolic processes and growth in sugarcane, a fast-growing high-biomass crop, remain unclear. Here, a hydroponic experiment was conducted using sugarcane variety 'Yunzhe05-51′, applying seven NH 4 + /NO 3 − -ratios under a constant total N supply level of 10 mmol·L −1 . Plant growth, activities of N-related enzymes, and dual transcriptomic and untargeted metabolomic responses were measured to investigate the regulation of N and C metabolism. The results indicated that an NH 4 + /NO 3 − -ratio of 20/80 was optimal for sugarcane growth. Enhanced activities of leaf NO 3 − reductase and NH 4 + anabolic enzymes, together with more balanced C and N metabolic processes, explained the potential regulatory mechanisms that promoted sugarcane growth under this ratio. NO 3 − -only treatment downregulated the expression and abundance of several genes and metabolites associated with photosynthesis, while promoting NO 3 − transport and reduction. When NH 4 + supply exceeded 4 mmol·L −1 , sugarcane showed signs of toxicity. Although activities of NH 4 + assimilation enzymes were relatively lower under exclusive NH 4 + supply, high NH 4 + concentrations resulted in higher L-glutamate levels, indicating growth inhibition under such conditions related to disruptions in protein posttranslational modifications. Furthermore, several metabolites and metabolic pathways associated with stress tolerance and detoxification were activated under high NH 4 + conditions. Collectively, this study elucidates the optimal NH 4 + /NO 3 − -ratio for sugarcane growth under adequate N availability and provides insights into the underlying metabolic regulatory mechanisms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: