Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speech emotion recognition (SER) infers affective states from speech signals, but positional encoding for acoustic tokens remains underexplored in Transformer-based SER. Existing models often reuse encodings designed for text and do not explicitly account for the different sequential and two-dimensional structures of acoustic representations. We propose Fibonacci Position Embedding (FPE) and Fibonacci Target Shutter (FTS). FTS constructs overlapping candidate-index sets over time–frequency token grids, and FPE samples a Fibonacci index and applies its modulo-wrapped, dimension-dependent phase rotation to query and key vectors. The modules are integrated into STRE-Former, which fuses Wav2Vec, log-mel spectrogram, and MFCC representations through asymmetric cross-representation attention with representation-specific positional encodings. We also introduce an implementation-consistent conditional-entropy formulation that quantifies uncertainty in recovering a token location from its sampled positional representation; this quantity characterizes positional ambiguity rather than downstream modeling capacity. Experiments over 64 positional-encoding combinations on IEMOCAP and MELD identify dataset-dependent highest-observed configurations, reaching 74.21% weighted accuracy on IEMOCAP-4, 74.54% on IEMOCAP-6, and 49.44% on MELD. These empirical observations suggest that the relative behavior of positional-encoding strategies may depend on the acoustic representation and evaluation dataset, rather than supporting a single universally optimal scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: