Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the role of relationality in buyer–supplier negotiations and how it varies across cultural settings. Design/methodology/approach Using a multisession simulation design, this study recruited research participants (n = 82) from diverse cultural backgrounds to play the role of either buyer or supplier for two negotiation tasks. Regression analyses were used to test the relationships among relational constructs as well as the moderating role of relational culture. Findings Results show that negotiators’ relational self-construal enhances their relational commitment to the ongoing negotiations, which leads to a higher level of relational capital accumulated at the end of negotiations. The impact of relational self-construal on relational commitment and that of relational commitment on counterparts’ relational capital are stronger for negotiators from a high (as opposed to low) relational cultural background. Furthermore, intercultural negotiation context, when compared with intracultural context, weakens the impact of relational commitment on relational capital. Originality/value This research is among the first to empirically examine the culturally varied relationality in negotiations. The findings offer important theoretical and practical implications regarding how relationality, when interacting with cultural factors, has varying impacts on business negotiations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: