Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article critiques the notion that Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a one-way linear trend from lower to higher levels. It introduces the idea of a contrast between abundance and deficiency motivation and uses this to suggest that the usual table of needs can be split into two vertically. At each level, we have a choice between abundance (being) motivation and deficiency motivation, and we have to take responsibility for this.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Rowan (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: