Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the x-ray structure of the human dihydrofolate reductase, phenylalanine 31 and phenylalanine 34 have been shown to be involved in hydrophobic interactions with bound substrates and inhibitors. Using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and a bacterial expression system producing the wild-type and mutant human dihydrofolate reductases at levels of 10% of the bacterial protein, we have constructed, expressed, and purified a serine 31 (S31) mutant and a serine 34 (S34) mutant. Fluorescence titration experiments indicated that S31 bound the substrate H2folate 10-fold tighter and the coenzyme NADPH 2-fold tighter than the wild-type human dihydrofolate reductase. The serine 31 mutation had little effect on the steady-state kinetic properties of the enzyme but produced a 100-fold increase in the dissociation constant (Kd) for the inhibitor methotrexate. The serine 34 mutant had much greater alterations in its properties than S31; specifically, S34 had a 3-fold reduction in the Km for NADPH, a 24-fold increase in the Km for H2folate, a 3-fold reduction in the overall reaction rate kcat, and an 80,000-fold increase in the Kd for methotrexate. In addition, the pH dependence of the steady-state kinetic parameters of S34 were different from that of the wild-type enzyme. These results suggest that phenylalanine 31 and phenylalanine 34 make very different contributions to ligand binding and catalysis in the human dihydrofolate reductase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schweitzer et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: