Why the study?
What are the ionic mechanisms underlying the enhancement of cardiac pacemaking activity by mechanical stretch in the mammalian SA node?
What are the ionic mechanisms underlying the enhancement of cardiac pacemaking activity by mechanical stretch in the mammalian SA node?
Mechanosensitive Cl- channels and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization appear to mediate stretch-induced increases in SA node pacemaker activity.
Mechanosensitive Cl− channels and Ca2+ mobilization mediate stretch-enhanced SA node pacemaking in mammals; leaves open human relevance.
Ionic mechanisms underlying the enhancement of cardiac pacemaking activity by mechanical stretch were investigated in the isolated rabbit sinoatrial (SA) node. A 5-s stretch of 0.2-2.0 g was applied to small tissue strips (1.5 mm x 3.0 mm) of the SA node using a mechanical stimulator. Spontaneous excitation cycle length (SPCL) was monitored by recording endocardial surface potential through modified bipolar electrodes with high-gain amplification. Influence of neurotransmitters released from nerve terminals was eliminated by atropine and propranolol. A stretch > 0.2 g caused a significant shortening of SPCL; there was a positive correlation between the force and the maximum shortening of SPCL. Treatment of the preparation with gadolinium (10 microM) or glibenclamide (1 microM) did not affect the force-response relationship. The positive chronotropic response to mechanical stretch > 0.5 g was reduced significantly by treatment with 4,4'-dinitrostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (5mM), 4-acetamido-4'-isothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (1 mM), or 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (50 microM). The positive chronotropic response was also reduced in a low-Ca2+ (0.36 mM) medium and by bath application of ryanodine (0.1 microM) or thapsigargin (2 microM). These findings suggest the possible involvement of mechanosensitive Cl- channels and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in the stretch-induced enhancement of pacemaking activity in the mammalian SA node, although other conceivable mechanisms cannot be ruled out.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arai et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: