Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Because the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae are not well explored, we studied the activity of colistin against K. pneumoniae in an in vitro PK/PD model simulating different dosing regimens. Methods: Three clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae with MICs of 0.5, 1 and 4 mg/L were tested in an in vitro PK/PD model following a dose-fractionation design over a period of 24 h. A high and low inoculum of 107 and 104 cfu/mL with and without a heteroresistant subpopulation, respectively, were used. PK/PD indices associated with colistin activity were explored and Monte Carlo analysis was performed in order to determine the PTA for achieving a bactericidal effect (2 log kill). Results: The fAUC/MIC (R2 = 0.64-0.68) followed by fCmax/MIC (R2 = 0.55-0.63) best described colistin's 24 h log10 cfu/mL reduction for both low and high inocula. Dosing regimens with fCmax/MIC ≥6 were always associated with a bactericidal effect (P = 0.0025). However, at clinically achievable concentrations, usually below fCmax/MIC = 6, an fAUC/MIC ≥25 was more predictive of a bactericidal effect. Using a dosing regimen of 9 MU/day, the PTA for this pharmacodynamic target was 100%, 5%-70% and 0%, for isolates with MICs of ≤0.5, 1 and ≥2 mg/L, respectively. Dosing regimens that aim for a trough level of 1 mg/L achieve coverage of strains up to 0.5 mg/L (target trough/MIC = 2 mg/L). Conclusions: Characterization of the pharmacodynamics of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae in an in vitro model of infection indicates that a revision of current susceptibility breakpoints is needed. Therapeutic drug monitoring of colistin to achieve pharmacodynamic targets in individual patients is highly recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsala et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: