Why the study?
Although blink rate variability can be used as a psychophysiological measure, its efficiency for mental state recognition compared with blink rate had not been investigated.
Does blink rate variability (BRV) improve mental state recognition compared to blink rate (BR) in individuals undergoing cognitive load tasks?
Does blink rate variability (BRV) improve mental state recognition compared to blink rate (BR) in individuals undergoing cognitive load tasks?
Blink rate variability shows stronger potential for mental state recognition than traditional blink rate analysis.
BRV may aid cognitive monitoring in research settings; leaves open clinical translation and prospective validation.
Recent research has unearthed that blink rate variability (BRV) can be employed as a psychophysiological measure. However, its efficiency for mental state recognition (MSR) has not been investigated yet. Because BRV can indicate dynamics inherent in eye blinks, we conjectured that BRV might exhibit stronger abilities for the MSR if compared with blink rate (BR), known as the leading indicator derived from eye blinks for MSR. Therefore, in this paper, we attempted to differentiate between high and low cognitive loads of an individual through the analyses of BR and BRV, respectively, which could be viewed as a preliminary study for comparing their MSR abilities. First, an n -back experiment was performed to collect data. Then, in order to characterize the phenomenon of BRV, the features were extracted from its time and frequency domains, respectively. Finally, the area under the curve (AUC) values of BRV and BR for MSR were estimated by the ten commonly used classifiers, respectively. The results indicated that BRV achieves significantly higher AUC values than BR, which suggests its strong potentiality for MSR. In sum, the BRV may prove to be a promising method for the MSR, which should be considered in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: