Why the study?
Does structured practice of emotion regulation improve the efficiency of emotion regulation and increase heart rate variability?
Does structured practice of emotion regulation improve the efficiency of emotion regulation and increase heart rate variability?
Structured practice of emotion regulation can facilitate automatic control of negative emotions and increase heart rate variability, with effects persisting beyond training.
May enhance emotion regulation efficiency and HRV; hypothesis-generating for clinical populations.
Emotion regulation (ER) is vital to everyday functioning. However, the effortful nature of many forms of ER may lead to regulation being inefficient and potentially ineffective. The present research examined whether structured practice could increase the efficiency of ER. During three training sessions, comprising a total of 150 training trials, participants were presented with negatively valenced images and asked either to "attend" (control condition) or "reappraise" (ER condition). A further group of participants did not participate in training but only completed follow-up measures. Practice increased the efficiency of ER as indexed by decreased time required to regulate emotions and increased heart rate variability (HRV). Furthermore, participants in the ER condition spontaneously regulated their negative emotions two weeks later and reported being more habitual in their use of ER. These findings indicate that structured practice can facilitate the automatic control of negative emotions and that these effects persist beyond training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christou-Champi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: