Why the study?
CKD is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular mortality, and measuring myocardial perfusion reserve reflects vascular capacity and microvascular responsiveness.
Does myocardial perfusion reserve differ between kidney transplant patients with CKD stage 2-3 and healthy controls?
Does myocardial perfusion reserve differ between kidney transplant patients with CKD stage 2-3 and healthy controls?
Myocardial perfusion during stress is preserved in kidney transplant patients with CKD stage 2-3, and their reduced myocardial perfusion reserve is explained by increased resting myocardial perfusion due to higher cardiac workload.
Uncorrected MPR should not yet infer microvascular dysfunction after transplant; leaves open confirmatory PET studies of rest-flow correction.
Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular mortality. Endothelial dysfunction can be studied measuring myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). MPR is the ratio of stress and rest myocardial perfusion (MP) and reflects the capacity of vascular bed to increase perfusion and microvascular responsiveness. In this pilot study, our aim was to assess MPR of 19 patients with kidney transplant (CKD stages 2–3) and of ten healthy controls with quantitative [ 15 O]H 2 O positron emission tomography (PET) method. Results Basal MP was statistically significantly higher at rest in the kidney transplant patients than in the healthy controls [1.3 (0.4) ml/min/g and 1.0 (0.2) ml/min/g, respectively, p = 0.0015]. After correction of basal MP by cardiac workload [MP corr = basal MP/individual rate pressure product (RPP) × average RPP of the healthy controls], the difference between the groups disappeared [0.9 (0.2) ml/min/g and 1.0 (0.3) ml/min/g, respectively, p = 0.55)]. There was no difference in stress MP between the kidney transplant patients and the healthy subjects [3.8 (1.0) ml/min/g and 4.0 (0.9) ml/min/g, respectively, p = 0.53]. Although MPR was reduced, MPR corr (stress MP/basal MP corr ) did not differ between the kidney transplant patients and the healthy controls [4.1 (1.1) and 4.3 (1.6), respectively, p = 0.8]. Conclusions MP during stress is preserved in kidney transplant patients with CKD stage 2–3. The reduced MPR appears to be explained by increased resting MP. This is likely linked with increased cardiac workload due to sympathetic overactivation in kidney transplant patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Päivärinta et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: