This article questions the wisdom of the patriarchal worldview underlying the practice of much contemporary social science. First, the assumptions informing such a worldview are challenged; the separation of humankind from nature, the mechanization of the Earth, and objectivity in science. Second, the limitations of a patriarchal perspective for guiding social science in general and leisure science in particular are examined. Third, ways in which feminist thinking may contribute to the development of a more connected and caring leisure science, a leisure science characterized by an ultimate goal of felicity are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel L. Dustin (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: