We report an empirical study of n -gram posterior probability confidence measures for statistical machine translation (SMT). We first describe an efficient and practical algorithm for rapidly computing n -gram posterior probabilities from large translation word lattices. These probabilities are shown to be a good predictor of whether or not the n -gram is found in human reference translations, motivating their use as a confidence measure for SMT. Comprehensive n -gram precision and word coverage measurements are presented for a variety of different language pairs, domains and conditions. We analyze the effect on reference precision of using single or multiple references, and compare the precision of posteriors computed from k -best lists to those computed over the full evidence space of the lattice. We also demonstrate improved confidence by combining multiple lattices in a multi-source translation framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gispert et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: