Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Past research on delinquency and crime has provided convincing data about correlates but not about causes, because it has been largely cross‐sectional in design. Whereas cross‐sectional research focuses on variations between subjects, longitudinal research can provide information about changes within subjects, which are more important for causes, prevention, and treatment. Many of the most important results in criminology have been obtained in longitudinal or experimental studies, and the major studies of these types are reviewed here. It is now desirable to combine the two methods in a new coordinated program of longitudinal studies including experimental interventions or quasi‐experimental analyses. Such projects could study several overlapping cohorts, extend from birth to adulthood, have frequent data collection, and obtain data from a variety of sources about many different types of antisocial behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David P. Farrington (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: