Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies evaluating exercise interventions, few studies have evaluated the effect at follow-up. OBJECTIVES: This paper presents follow-up data for participants who completed the exercise interventions in a large randomised controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred twenty-one people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with minimal gait impairment who completed 10 weeks of community-based exercise interventions were evaluated by a blinded assessor 12 weeks after the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 version 2 (MSIS-29,v2) physical component. Other outcomes were the MSIS-29 psychological component, the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. RESULTS: The positive effect on the physical impact of MS was not maintained from baseline to follow-up (-1.6, 95% CI -0.8, 4.0, p=0.189). The psychological impact and the impact of fatigue remained significantly improved (-3.5, 95% CI -6.1, -1.0, p = 0.006 and -4.68, 95% CI -6.9, -2.5, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no time effect for the 6MWT (f = 1.76, p = 0.179) although the trend suggests reversal of the benefits gained from the physiotherapist (PT)- and fitness instructor (FI)-led intervention. CONCLUSION: The maintained benefit on the psychological impact of MS and fatigue may have important personal and socioeconomic consequences; however, it is important to find ways to maintain the physical benefits of exercise over the long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrett et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: