Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commitment is a core concept in the study of buyer-supplier relationships. Much of extant research on commitment in buyer-supplier relationships utilizes a global, unidimensional definition of commitment. In contrast, research on employees’ organizational commitment utilizes a three-facet model, separately considering continuance commitment, affective commitment, and normative commitment. A review of the literature suggests three gaps. First that multiple facets of commitment, particularly normative commitment have been relatively unexplored. Second, the vast majority of research examines a buyer’s commitment to a supplier and much less a supplier’s commitment to a buyer. Finally, commitment research in developing countries is limited. A three-facet model of commitment—with antecedents and outcomes of each—is developed. Data is collected from buyers and suppliers in Thailand, providing an in-built replication and two tests of each hypothesis. The results show support for the three-facet model and identify light and dark side outcomes from the different facets. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cannon et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: