Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 18, 1995BMJOpen Access

Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Mike Clarke
Mike ClarkeSouth African Medical Research Council

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Mike Clarke (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a813da5878fbc248522eddchttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6981.741a
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews1995 · 132 citations
  2. 2Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan and prednisolone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an overview of published trials.1992 · 340 citations
  3. 3Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.1986 · 757 citations
  4. 4Systematic Reviews: Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?1994 · 117 citations
  5. 5Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis1987 · 217 citations