Why the study?
Community-partner and patient-partner engagement in women's CVD research needed to be described across research phases, along with recommendations for future engagement.
This rapid review reveals negligible community engagement and inadequate patient-partner collaboration in women's cardiovascular disease research, alongside poor reporting of sex, gender, race, and ethnicity, highlighting the need for more inclusive partnership across all research phases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insufficient patient-partner engagement in women's CVD research requires urgent improvement; confirms gaps and extends calls for inclusive collaboration across all phases.
The primary objective of this rapid review is to describe community-partner and patient-partner engagement in women's cardiovascular disease (CVD) research. Secondary objectives are to: (i) describe the phase of the research in which community and patient partners were engaged; (ii) define the level of engagement at each research phase; and (iii) make recommendations for future engagement of community and/or patient partners in women's CVD research. Rapid review guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and Tricco et al. were used to search 5 databases using medical subject headings (MeSH) and/or keywords. Participants included women (cis and trans) aged > 18 years who had ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or stroke. A risk of bias assessment was not undertaken. Findings are summarized and/or clustered as community-based participatory research, or patient-oriented and/or patient-partner research. Our search yielded 39,998 titles and abstracts. Of these, 35 were included in a final narrative synthesis, comprising data from 474 community and/or patient partners, including 417 (88%) women. Over 85% of community partners collaborated in the design and/or planning and implementation of women's CVD research; most originated in the US; only one originated in Canada. Most patient-oriented and patient-partner research originated in Canada. However, less than 50% of patient partners collaborated in any phase of research. Sex, gender, race, and ethnicity were rarely reported. Results suggest negligible community and inadequate patient-oriented and/or patient-partner engagement in women's CVD research in Canada. Improved CVD outcomes for women may be achieved with better community- and patient-partner collaboration across all phases of research, genders, race, and ethnicities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parry et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: