Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discrimination between isoleucine and valine is achieved with different accuracies by isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from E. coli MRE 600. The recognition process consists of two initial discrimination steps and a pretransfer and a posttransfer proofreading event. The overall discrimination factors D were determined from kcat and Km values observed in aminoacylation of tRNA(Ile)-C-C-A with isoleucine and valine. From aminoacylation of the modified tRNA species tRNA(Ile)-C-C-A(3'NH2) initial discrimination factors I1 and pretransfer proofreading factors II1 were calculated. Factors I1 were computed from ATP consumption and D1, the overall discrimination in aminoacylation of the modified tRNA; factors II1 were calculated as quotient of AMP formation rates. Initial discrimination factors I2 and posttransfer proofreading factors II2 were determined from AMP formation rates observed in aminoacylation of tRNA(Ile)-C-C-A. The observed overall discrimination varies up to a factor of about four according to conditions. Under standard assay conditions 72,000, under optimal conditions 144,000 correct aminoacyl-tRNAs are produced per one error while 1.1 or 1.7 ATPs are consumed. A comparison with isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from yeast shows that both enzymes act principally with the same recognition mechanism, but the enzyme from E. coli MRE 600 exhibits higher specificity and lower energy dissipation and does not show such high variation of accuracy as observed with the enzyme from yeast.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freist et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: