An important management challenge is to maintain productive populations of Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.), despite highly variable environments and our weak understanding of future climatic conditions and mechanisms that link them to salmon. This understanding could be improved by including environmental covariates in salmon population models and applying advanced “meta-analyses” to large data sets to better estimate underlying functional relationships. However, the performance of such models needs to be determined in the context of an overall system. We therefore simulated a 15-population salmon fishery system and compared the performance (in terms of catch and an index of conservation concern) of 10 forecasting and stock assessment models, ranging from simple to complex, by stochastically simulating components of a salmon fishery using a “closed-loop simulation” (or “management strategy evaluation”) under a variety of plausible future climatic scenarios. We found that complex models perform better in some situations. However, their incremental benefits are small and are swamped by the large variability in outcomes of management actions caused by “outcome uncertainty”, which reflects noncompliance of fishing vessels with regulations as well as variation in catchability. Reduction of this outcome uncertainty should therefore be a top priority, as should evaluations of more complex stock assessment models before adopting them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorner et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: