It has been suggested that maintaining ventilation during bypass might reduce lung injury, which is a common complication of cardiac surgery. In order to assess this, a study is being undertaken to examine the effect upon a number of parameters that may be indicative of lung injury, of continued ventilation compared with discontinued ventilation whilst on bypass. The following parameters have been assessed: extravascular lung water, static and dynamic compliance, ratio of left atrial/right atrial white blood count, alveolar arterial oxygen gradient and the respiratory index together with clinical end points. Provisional results are reported. Twenty-three elective patients for coronary artery surgery have to date been randomised to either ventilation (VB) (n=12) or non-ventilation on bypass (NVB) (n=11). The post-bypass extravascular lung water was significantly smaller in the VB group compared to the NVB group (530+/-50 ml vs. 672+/-32 ml; P=0.028). Extubation time was also significantly shorter in the VB group (3.6+/-0.3 h vs. 4.8+/-0.4 h; P=0.038). The provisional results of this work in progress are suggestive that continued ventilation during bypass may reduce lung injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: