Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Binding in phenonium ions [C 6 H 5 −C 2 (OH) 4 ] +, [C 6 H 5 −C 2 (CH 3 ) 4 ] +, [C 6 H 5 −C 2 F 4 ] +, [ p -NC−C 6 H 4 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [ p -OHC−C 6 H 4 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [C 6 H 5 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [ p -F−C 6 H 4 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [ p -H 3 C−C 6 H 4 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [ p -HO−C 6 H 4 −C 2 H 4 ] +, [C 6 H 5 −C 2 (CHO) 4 ] +, and [C 6 H 5 −C 2 (CN) 4 ] + was investigated with the B3LYP/6-31G* method. The analysis of the Kohn−Sham orbitals and a Bader analysis of the computed electron density of the phenonium ion, [C 6 H 5 −C 2 H 4 ] +, clearly show that back-bonding from the phenyl cation moiety to the ethylene fragment determines the formation of the three-membered cycle, rendering the shielding of the ipso carbon atom similar to that for an sp 3 C, while an extension of the conjugation occurs as both π systems merge with each other. The important stabilization gained from this process determines the orthogonal conformation of the phenonium ion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rı́o et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: