Why the study?
Does routine biochemical and hematological screening improve perioperative care or outcomes in otherwise healthy patients undergoing elective general surgery?
Does routine biochemical and hematological screening improve perioperative care or outcomes in otherwise healthy patients undergoing elective general surgery?
Routine preoperative laboratory screening in healthy general surgery patients yields unexpected abnormalities that do not alter clinical management or outcomes, suggesting selective testing based on risk factors is more appropriate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine testing yields no management changes in healthy elective surgery patients; supports selective approaches but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of routine biochemical and hematological screening of otherwise healthy patients prior to elective general surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective laboratory screening tests were done for 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing elective general surgery at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait, from January to August 1999. Patients with abnormal laboratory results were interviewed and examined preoperatively as part of the present study protocol, to identify a possible cause for the abnormal laboratory result. The perioperative course of these patients was also monitored. RESULTS: Approximately 14% of the preoperative tests were abnormal, 9.2% of which was expected while 4.9% was unexpected; there was no change in the preoperative care of patients with unexpected abnormalities, nor was there surgical delay or related postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that laboratory tests should be selectively used when the patient has appropriate risk factors. Instead, greater emphasis should be placed on history and physical examination. Application of such policy will result in substantial financial savings that could be utilized to improve the health care system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsumait et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: