Why the study?
PRV has been used as a surrogate for HRV, but physiological factors such as blood pressure changes may affect PRV differently than HRV.
Does pulse rate variability accurately reflect heart rate variability across different blood pressure states in critically ill patients?
Does pulse rate variability accurately reflect heart rate variability across different blood pressure states in critically ill patients?
Pulse rate variability is not a perfect surrogate for heart rate variability in critically ill patients, as it is more sensitive to blood pressure changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRV should not substitute for HRV in critically ill patients; leaves open whether its BP sensitivity adds monitoring value.
Heart rate variability (HRV) utilizes the electrocardiogram (ECG) and has been widely studied as a non-invasive indicator of cardiac autonomic activity. Pulse rate variability (PRV) utilizes photoplethysmography (PPG) and recently has been used as a surrogate for HRV. Several studies have found that PRV is not entirely valid as an estimation of HRV and that several physiological factors, including the pulse transit time (PTT) and blood pressure (BP) changes, may affect PRV differently than HRV. This study aimed to assess the relationship between PRV and HRV under different BP states: hypotension, normotension, and hypertension. Using the MIMIC III database, 5 min segments of PPG and ECG signals were used to extract PRV and HRV, respectively. Several time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indices were obtained from these signals. Bland-Altman analysis, correlation analysis, and Friedman rank sum tests were used to compare HRV and PRV in each state, and PRV and HRV indices were compared among BP states using Kruskal-Wallis tests. The findings indicated that there were differences between PRV and HRV, especially in short-term and nonlinear indices, and although PRV and HRV were altered in a similar manner when there was a change in BP, PRV seemed to be more sensitive to these changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mejía‐Mejía et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: