Why the study?
PPG is susceptible to motion artifacts and noise, challenges that intensify under arrhythmias like AF where distortions can impair HR estimation.
Does a signal quality assessment algorithm with SDSD-based filtering improve heart rate estimation accuracy from wrist PPG in hospitalized cardiac patients?
Does a signal quality assessment algorithm with SDSD-based filtering improve heart rate estimation accuracy from wrist PPG in hospitalized cardiac patients?
Integrating a machine learning-based signal quality assessment with SDSD filtering significantly improves the accuracy of heart rate estimation from wrist PPG in hospitalized patients with arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve wrist PPG heart rate accuracy in hospitalized cardiac patients; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Reliable heart rate (HR) detection is essential for long-term cardiac monitoring, particularly in hospitalized patients with complex conditions. Due to its optical and non-invasive nature, photoplethysmography (PPG) is inherently susceptible to motion artifacts and noise. These challenges intensify under arrhythmic conditions such as atrial fibrillation (AF), where signal distortions may blur the boundary between poor-quality segments and pathological rhythms, potentially impairing downstream tasks like HR estimation. This study developed a signal quality assessment (SQA) algorithm designed for this high-risk clinical population and evaluated its robustness through HR estimation. We collected 24-hour synchronous PPG and electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings from 49 hospitalized cardiac patients, with all PPG segments manually annotated for quality. External validation was conducted using the MIMIC-IV dataset. To avoid dependence on specific segment lengths or classifier types, we assessed SQA performance using seven machine learning models and four segmentation lengths. The SQA framework was then applied to HR estimation to evaluate clinical utility. We implemented a Standard Deviation of Successive Differences (SDSD)-based peak filtering method and compared it with an autocorrelation-based approach under different cardiac rhythm conditions. Threshold tuning in both SQA classification and SDSD filtering was conducted to explore the balance between data usability and reliable HR estimation. The proposed model achieved an AUROC of 96.1% (Sinus Rhythm (SR) + AF), with 90.6% on MIMIC-IV. Predicted SQA labels closely matched manual annotations, with mean absolute error (MAE) differences of 0.08 bpm (SR+AF), 0.25 bpm (SR), 0.62 bpm (AF), and 0.53 bpm (MIMIC-IV). SDSD reduced MAE by 46.57% for SR+AF, 41.67% for SR, and 49.69% for AF, further demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating SQA into HR estimation workflows. • Developed a signal quality assessment method for high-risk hospitalized PPG recordings. • Clinically validated the method via downstream heart rate estimation accuracy. • Combined handcrafted features, feature selection, and seven classifiers across segment lengths. • Applied SDSD-based filtering and autocorrelation for rhythm-specific HR estimation. • Threshold tuning supports adaptive trade-offs between signal coverage and HR precision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lahdenoja et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: