Why the study?
Can (18)F-FDG-PET-CT distinguish Libman-Sacks endocarditis from infective endocarditis in patients with SLE and mitral valve vegetations?
Can (18)F-FDG-PET-CT distinguish Libman-Sacks endocarditis from infective endocarditis in patients with SLE and mitral valve vegetations?
(18)F-FDG-PET-CT demonstrates increased glucose uptake in Libman-Sacks endocarditis due to inflammation but cannot reliably distinguish it from culture-negative infective endocarditis.
Cannot rely on FDG-PET-CT to differentiate Libman-Sacks from infective endocarditis in SLE; leaves open need for alternative diagnostics.
We present a 54-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), fever, pericardial effusion and a mitral valve vegetation. (18)F-Fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT ((18)F-FDG-PET-CT) showed very high accumulation of the isotope at the mitral valve. The patient underwent cardiothoracic surgery and pathologic examinations showed characteristic morphology of Libman-Sacks vegetations. All microbiological examinations including blood cultures, microscopy, culture and 16s PCR of the valve were negative and the diagnosis of Libman-Sacks endocarditis was convincing. It is difficult to distinguish Libman-Sacks endocarditis from culture-negative infective endocarditis (IE). Molecular imaging techniques are being used increasingly in cases of suspected IE but no studies have previously reported the use in patients with Libman-Sacks endocarditis. In the present case, (18)F-FDG-PET-CT clearly demonstrated the increased glucose uptake caused by infiltrating white blood cells in the ongoing inflammatory process at the mitral valve. In conclusion, (18)F-FDG-PET-CT cannot be used to distinguish between IE and non-infective Libman-Sacks vegetations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahl et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: