Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ruthenium triflate complex Cp*(PiPr 3 )RuOTf ( 1 ) was generated from the reaction of Cp*(PiPr 3 )RuCl with Me 3 SiOTf in dibutyl ether. Complex 1 reacted with primary and secondary silanes to produce a family of Ru(IV) silyl dihydride complexes of the type Cp*(PiPr 3 )Ru(H) 2 (SiRR′OTf) ( 3 – 12 ). Structural analyses of complexes 8 (R = R′ = Ph) and 12 (R = R′ = fluorenyl) revealed the presence of a tetrahedral silicon center and a four-legged piano stool geometry about ruthenium. Anion abstraction from Cp*(PiPr 3 )Ru(H) 2 (SiHROTf) by [Et 3 Si·toluene][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] afforded hydrogen-substituted cationic ruthenium silylene complexes [Cp*(PiPr 3 )Ru(H) 2 (═SiHR)][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] (R = Mes ( 13 ), R = Si(SiMe 3 ) ( 14 )) that display a significant Ru–H···Si interaction, as indicated by relatively large 2 J SiH coupling constants ( 2 J SiH = 58.2 Hz ( 13 ), 2 J SiH = 37.1 Hz ( 14 )). The syntheses of secondary silylene complexes [Cp*(PiPr 3 )Ru(H) 2 (═SiRR′)][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] (R = R′ = Ph ( 15 ); R = Ph, R′ = Me ( 16 ), R = R′ = fluorenyl ( 17 )) were also achieved by anion abstraction with [Et 3 Si·toluene][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ]. Complexes 15 – 17 do not display strong Ru–H···Si secondary interactions, as indicated by very small 2 J SiH coupling constant values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fasulo et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: