Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The problems in genome and proteome classification of mutations causing a thalassemia are synthesis, e.g. which thalassemia's database will choose? and then the technique that used in biomining to classify mutations causing thalassemia who can say is effective/optimal. This paper proposed genomics classification for β-thalassemia’s mutations in ITHALNET-IthaGenes database [1] (which is a modern and more comprehensive comparing to other thalassemia databases about 63% of thalassemia’s mutations) using data biomining method based on multiple neural network learning algorithms (Conjugate Gradient Descent, quick propagation, online backpropagation BP and batch BP algorithm). The experimental results based on architecture of BP [457-228-1] with (1000) iteration shows conjugate gradient descent is optimal biomining technique comparing to other techniques of diagnosis mutation of B-thalassemia, which shows in training stage with error improvement= 5.20E-08 and testing stage Correlate= 0.999601 & R-Squared= 0.9992, in quick propagation gives error improvement= 5.20E-08, Correlate= 0.997086 & R-Squared= 0.994173, in Batch BP reveals error improvement = 0.257249, Correlate= 0.975762 & R-Squared= 0.931719, finally the online propagation error improvement= 0.000013 and testing stage Correlate= 0.975277 & R-Squared= 0.900057). Â
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayad Ghany Ismaeel (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: