Sir, Since the early 1990s, several extended-spectrum oxacillinases (ES-OXA) have been reported in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mainly from Turkey and France.1 Most of these enzymes, which inactivate ceftazidime and cefepime, differ from the narrow-spectrum penicillinases OXA-2 (e.g. OXA-15 and -32) and OXA-10 (e.g. OXA-11, -13, -14, -16, -17, -19 and -28) by one or more amino acid substitutions.2 With the notable exception of OXA-18, they are not significantly antagonized in their hydrolytic activities by clavulanic acid, an inhibitor widely used in routine testing to detect extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). As a result, their identification in the medical laboratory is often challenging for clinical microbiologists.1 In this paper, we describe the emergence in a patient under therapy of a novel ES-OXA, named OXA-147, deriving from OXA-35. In January 2009, two isolates of P. aeruginosa (4747 and 4759) exhibiting different susceptibilities to ceftazidime were isolated from the infected foot of a diabetic patient admitted to Hospital Jean Minjoz in Besançon (France). Table 1 shows that while being more resistant to ceftazidime and aztreonam, isolate 4747 was more susceptible than isolate 4759 to ticarcillin ± clavulanic acid, piperacillin ± tazobactam, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. At the time these isolates were recovered, the patient was under treatment with ceftriaxone plus rifampicin for an infectious endocarditis due to Proteus mirabilis. A subsequent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis experiment demonstrated that the two strains shared an identical DraI banding pattern and, thus, were closely related (data not shown).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fournier et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: