Higher education faculty's teaching-related activities are often evaluated either for summative (personnel/tenure decisions) or formative (developmental) purposes. Although many faculty members feel they benefit from thoughtful attention to their teaching, other faculty find the peer-review process intimidating, meaningless, or both. The author presents five useful ways for peer reviewers to enrich the peer-review process for their colleagues
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vicki K. Carter (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: