Why the study?
Does sodium nitroprusside modulate Angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction differently in mesenteric and renal circulations in anesthetized pigs?
Does sodium nitroprusside modulate Angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction differently in mesenteric and renal circulations in anesthetized pigs?
Sodium nitroprusside inhibits Angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction in the mesenteric but not the renal circulation, suggesting regional differences in vasoregulation.
SNP effects on Ang II vasoconstriction differ regionally in pigs; leaves open translation to human mesenteric versus renal beds.
BACKGROUND: The role of systemic arterial pressure for the vascular effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) and the interactions between Ang II and perfusion pressure-dependent local vascular control mechanisms are not well understood. This study addresses these aspects of exogenous Ang II in the mesenteric and renal regional circulations. METHODS: Ang II was infused in incremental doses (0-200 microg/h) in anesthetized instrumented pigs (n=10). Renal and portal blood flows were measured by perivascular ultrasound. In the second part of the study, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was infused at doses titrated to keep mean arterial pressure constant, in spite of concurrent Ang II administration. RESULTS: Powerful dose-dependent vasoconstrictions by Ang II were found in renal and mesenteric vascular beds (at highest Ang II doses vascular resistances increased by 109% and 88% respectively). Ang II-induced vasoconstriction was fully inhibited in the mesenteric, but not in the renal circulation, during conditions of constant mean arterial pressures achieved by SNP infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric, but not renal, vasoconstriction by Ang II was inhibited by pharmacological maintenance of perfusion pressure. This could reflect differences between these vascular beds as regards the importance of co-acting myogenic pressure-dependent vasoconstriction. Alternatively, as the drug chosen for pressure control, sodium nitroprusside, serves as a nitric oxide donor, the relative balance between nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation and Ang II-induced vasoconstriction could have regional differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Broomé et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: