Situation-specific affirmation and aid items of the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire measure unique dimensions of support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports distinct Norbeck subscale scoring; leaves open links to cardiovascular outcomes or interventions.
BACKGROUND: Situation-specific social support, measured by comparably worded Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire (NSSQ) items, holds promise in the development of context-specific theories at the practice level. However, psychometric work on situation-specific NSSQ items is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the statistical parameters of situation-specific NSSQ items (affect, affirmation, and aid). METHODS: Using data (N = 154) collected for a larger study, the parameters of three LISREL models were estimated by the generally weighted least squares method using an asymptotic covariance matrix. RESULTS: The modified two-factor model was accepted (chi2 = 11.54, df = 7, p < or = .12). Overall, parameter estimates suggest that, in this research context, two situation-specific items (affirmation and aid) measure unique dimensions of social support. CONCLUSIONS: In this instance, situation-specific affirmation and aid items measure unique dimensions of support. Guided by strong theory, investigators should develop situation-specific items based on the original NSSQ items.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eileen Gigliotti (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: