Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both 6,6″″-dimethyl-(dmqpy) and 6,6″″-dimethyl-4′,4‴-diphenyl-2,2′:6′,2″:6″,2‴:6‴,2″″-quinquepyridine (dmpqpy) have been found to form dinuclear double helical silver(I) complexes [Ag2(dmqpy)2][ClO4]21 and [Ag2(dmpqpy)2][ClO4]2·2H2O 2. The introduced terminal methyl groups play a crucial role in the assembly processes. According to their crystal structures, the ligand adopts the usual [2 + 3] co-ordination mode in 1 and the silver(I) is five-co-ordinated with a flattened and distorted trigonal-bipyramidal geometry. In 2 the ligand dmpqpy adopts a [2 + 1 + 2] mode and is unexpectedly tetradentate with the central pyridyl nitrogen atom having no direct co-ordination and acting as a rigid spacer. The silver(I) atoms are four-co-ordinated. It is supposed that the increased conjugation and rigidity caused by the phenyl groups at the 4′,4‴ positions makes it difficult for the central pyridine nitrogen to co-ordinate to AgI. Strong intramolecular π–π stacking interactions exist in complex 1, but the stacking effects in 2 are much weaker. The NMR results indicate that both complexes adopt more symmetric configurations in solution than in the solid state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: