Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I. Professor Robbins' tendency to “Radical Positivism” — The incompatibility of the means-end schema with the ideal of economics as a “positive” science in this sense, 512. — Criticism of his “atomism,” 516. — II. Outline of the general chain of means-ends relationships as a schema for classification of the sciences of action, 521. — The place of the “economic” element, 522. — Critical application to Professor Souter's position, 529. — His empiricist tendency and its implications, 534. — III. Some special problems: “Formalism,” 536. — Economic law and the realm of the “irrational,” 538. — Precision, Dynamics, 540. — Conclusion, 543.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talcott Parsons (1934) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: