Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content is a key factor in the forage palatability and livestock digestibility of alpine grassland. Traditional methods of measuring NDF are time-consuming and laborious, while multispectral remote sensing often has difficulty capturing subtle changes due to its broad spectral channels. In this study, we evaluate NDF using hyperspectral data and environmental factors (EFs) during 2016–2019. The artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) are used to construct models. The results show that: 1) compared with the correlation analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression can more effectively select the important variables for estimating NDF and achieve significant dimension reduction; 2) estimation accuracy of the models (coefficient of determination (R²) between 0.44 and 0.51, relative root mean square error (RMSE) between 4.31% and 4.61%) based on first derivative (FD) spectra is relatively better than the models based on original spectra (OR), log transformation (Log), and continuum removal (CR) spectra (R²between 0.35 and 0.46, RMSE between 4.39% and 4.92%). The RF model based on FD-Log-vegetation indices (VIs)-EFs is the best model (R² = 0.62, RMSE = 3.98%); and 3) compared with the EFs, hyperspectral feature plays a pivotal role in estimating NDF, with a total contribution of 81.66%, and red-edge and shortwave infrared (SWIR) regions are significant for estimating NDF. In general, the combination of hyperspectral data with the EFs significantly improves the accuracy of estimating NDF. This study provides important guidance for future efforts on estimating NDF of natural grassland using remote sensing and machine learning algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: