This paper reports on semi‐structured interviews with 76 former special school students now aged between 16 and 25. These young people were ‘disadvantaged’ rather than ‘disabled’ and many were experiencing ‘fractured’ transitions from school. Although they were more positive about their schools than similarly disadvantaged peers who had attended mainstream provision, they nonetheless raised concerns about the quality and usefulness of their experiences. On leaving school they had, in many cases, moved from one unsatisfactory activity to another, without any obvious signs of progression. They displayed a high level of purposefulness but lacked personal and social resources to support their progression within somewhat unsupportive structures. The paper argues that an exclusive focus on transition from school is inadequate and that young people may need support well after this point, possibly from the Connexions service. It also suggests that the notion of ‘resilience’ may have more to offer than traditional special education discourses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dyson et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: