Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To ascertain the impact of environmental conditions on hydrogel contact lens dehydration. METHODS: Six young adult subjects wore an ACUVUE lens in one eye and a Proclear lens in the other eye for 200 minute sessions in arid, temperate, and arctic conditions, maintained in a purpose-built environmental chamber in an aerospace medical facility. Dehydration was determined by measuring lens water content before and after each session using a soft contact lens refractometer. Comfort of the lenses was assessed at the conclusion of each session. RESULTS: Lens dehydration was similar for the three environmental conditions (F2 = 0.3, P = 0.75). There was less dehydration with the Proclear lens compared with ACUVUE lens (F1 = 43.0, P = 0.001). No differences were detected with respect to lens comfort between the three environmental conditions (F2 = 2.0, P = 0.18) or the two lens types (F1 = 1.4, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Soft contact lens dehydration is unaffected by environmental extremes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: