Aims and method This audit examines the quality of ‘as required’ (p.r.n.) prescribing for in-patients before and after standard setting. Results There were improvements in writing oral/intramuscular prescriptions and in the use of different drugs regularly and p.r.n. There was a trend for improvement in completion of guidelines for those on high doses but completion was not influenced by hidden p.r.n. prescribing. Writing p.r.n. prescriptions as a ranged dose was common and did not improve significantly. Clinical implications By using some simple measures, improvements in some aspects of potentially problematic p.r.n. medication can be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelle Bowden (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: