Why the study?
Does surgery improve outcomes in patients with intractable ventricular arrhythmias?
Does surgery improve outcomes in patients with intractable ventricular arrhythmias?
This text introduces the context and rationale for surgical interventions in patients with intractable ventricular arrhythmias, particularly following myocardial infarction.
Rationale for surgery in post-MI intractable VT is outlined; leaves open whether outcomes improve in current practice.
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias may occur in a variety of congenital or acquired heart diseases.1 By far the largest group of susceptible persons are patients who have had myocardial infarction, in whom the occurrence of complex ventricular ectopic activity is associated with an increase in mortality independent of other risk variables.2 Even simple ventricular premature beats seem to have an adverse effect on survival in this group. Because of the serious implications of ventricular ectopic activity, great attention has been given to the origin of these arrhythmias and to the development of pharmacologic agents to control ventricular ectopic activity. Among patients . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John J. Collings (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: