This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two hundred eighty-one patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the shoulder over a 2-year period. Eighty-eight patients underwent arthroscopic surgery, and their surgical results were correlated with the findings at MR imaging. MR imaging enabled accurate prediction of anterior labral tears, with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 86%, and an accuracy of 92%. MR imaging was less effective in the prediction of tears of the superior labrum, with a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 95%. These two categories accounted for the majority of the surgically correctable disease. MR imaging was found to be unreliable in the prediction of posterior (sensitivity, 7.7%) or inferior (sensitivity, 40%) labral tears, isolated cases of which occurred in only two (2%) of those undergoing surgery. MR imaging proved to be a highly accurate, noninvasive technique for the clinical evaluation of shoulder instability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Legan et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: